Kizzume Forum Index
 HOME   album   FAQ   Search   Memberlist     Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 


Digital cable needs better quality standards

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Kizzume Forum Index -> Technology and Computers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kizzume
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 2832
Location: Tacoma, WA USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:12 pm    Post subject: Digital cable needs better quality standards Reply with quote

I personally prefer looking at REAL white noise than looking at NASTY jpg compression.

Here's the differences--you'll probably forever notice this after seeing this if you didn't notice already:

original

analog cable

digital cable


To me, watching an old vcr tape taped on slow (slp/ep) looks better than watching many digital cable channels. I hate bad jpg compression. I've tuned in on it now to where I can even see jpg compression on a dvd on a 12 inch tv--at least with a dvd you can usually only see it on poor-quality dvds (but you can still always see it on dark lighting fades). I sometimes HATE how I notice things--I really wish I could just turn that part of me off like a switch.

The thing I wonder is whether there's ANY quality standards that are going to be implemented in 2009 besides forcing everyone to look at jpg compression. I just hate it. I REALLY hope there will be some sort of upgrade to the digital tv compression standards--like switch to jpg2000 or something, or switch to something completely new. JPG compression produces such an awful-looking image unless it's set for super-high quality. For dvds it works because they're able to have the quality up high enough--USUALLY.

Why hasn't this sort of thing been upgraded? Do people honestly not notice this? Do banking companies care that it is literally impossible to read the fine print in their commercials because the compression is so bad?

Am I alone in this?
Back to top
jq



Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 1124

PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, this is another topic I can't comment too much one. The reason? I don't have cable, and my tv is not hd or anything like that. It is pretty old really. I bought it 6 years ago. It is even older than my computer!
Back to top
jq



Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 1124

PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also do not have a VCR Sad
Back to top
Kizzume
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 2832
Location: Tacoma, WA USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, the next time you're at someone's house who DOES have cable, watch for those elements. I just don't understand how it was supposed to be an upgrade from analog other than having more channels. People say, "I don't see the fuzz, it's clear", and my response is, "Yeah, the fuzz is blurred out by the compression." but people just don't notice it for some reason. People think I'm nuts. You have to pause a frame and then point out specific things--then they'll see it for a time.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Kizzume Forum Index -> Technology and Computers All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group, premodded by FoxyMods,and optimized by phpBB SEO.Skin by: K I Z Z U M E