 |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:14 pm Post subject: Drug legalization? |
|
|
I think all drugs, including prescription-only drugs, should be legal--then the ones that are "street drugs" now would be taxed like crazy and that tax money would go into non-religious programs to help people quit and for the medical treatment of side effects. I think if people have major issues with side effects of something they were not prescribed, they shouldn't have the right to sue, but they SHOULD be able to get treatment for those issues.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chuq

Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 135 Location: Gulf South
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I pretty much shot my wad about drugs on the Paul threat. Sorry, if I had noticed I would have posted here.
_________________ 'Politics' is made up of two words, 'poli,' which is Greek for 'many,' and 'tics,' which are blood-sucking insects.
- Gore Vidal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Sorry, I pretty much shot my wad about drugs on the Paul threat. Sorry, if I had noticed I would have posted here. |
| Quote: | There are other aspects to look at also. Taxation--if legal the govt would tax it and generate more income. Crime--since drugs account for a bunch of the crime stats then it would help eliminate some of the probs. Prisons--the population in prisons could be lessen, thus no need for massive spending on new prisons. There are a few other that could possibly benefit from the legalization of drugs.
Just look at the massive funds that could be used for the better of the population if there was no war on drugs.
On the Paul front, he seems to be the only "true" conservative in the running. Most of the others are pretty moderate. |
I think no matter if we legalize ALL of them or whatever, I think it would be much better than the system we have in place now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chuq

Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 135 Location: Gulf South
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will agree, the system now seems to create as many probs as it says it eliminates.
_________________ 'Politics' is made up of two words, 'poli,' which is Greek for 'many,' and 'tics,' which are blood-sucking insects.
- Gore Vidal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are there really people out there who truly believe from the bottom of their hearts think we can actually win the war on drugs?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hackfest

Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 413
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The War on drugs was lost right before it began.
_________________ The Democratic Anthem: The American Dream is okay! Until you make $250,000. Then you're the devil.
I can always count on message boards to consistently shatter my faith in humanity.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It has been as effective as prohibition was, except it costs a LOT more.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jq

Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 1124
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I think all drugs, including prescription-only drugs, should be legal--then the ones that are "street drugs" now would be taxed like crazy and that tax money would go into non-religious programs to help people quit and for the medical treatment of side effects. I think if people have major issues with side effects of something they were not prescribed, they shouldn't have the right to sue, but they SHOULD be able to get treatment for those issues. |
Unfortunately, like every other tax that was meant to go to something, (Like in our state, the lottery tax was supposed to go to schools :-/) even if the drugs were to be legalized and taxed, that money would go to waste. Just like our transit system so far. Light rail, and the monorail. What a disappointment.
Drug legalization, like taxes, seems more idealistic than realistic to me. If you look at areas where there are more drugs legal, (like amsterdam) you will find that their rate of drug use is also higher. Go figure.
Having said that, I believe some drugs SHOULD be legalized, or at least decriminalized. I think the idea of going to prison for pot is ridiculous. Let us decriminalize that.
But Meth should not be legalized. Meth labs destroy entire apartment buildings, kill infants, and meth the drug makes people absolutely crazy. I have known meth heads. I don't want their habit to be legal. I want them as far away from me as possible, aka prison.
I have seen its effects on people. I have seen that even once they are off the drug, they are STILL CRAZY. The craziness after prolonged meth use seems to never go away.
It sort of sucks that our stores have to get our information when we get cold medicine, but it has actually been pretty effective from what I understand.
In my opinion, there are drugs which should be legal. Tobacco, Alocohol, Marijuana-- and you may be able to convince me of some others I can't think of right now. But I have suffered from neighbors who do meth, and I don't want to give them a green light to cook it. I think Meth is what makes me think that NOT all drugs should be legal.
But I will agree that rehabilitation should be something we spend lots of money on, for ALL drugs (except marijuana. That's just stupid. I can't believe the government actually requires people to go to rehab for marijuana. Assholes.) If it ever gets put to a vote, you can be sure I will vote for money to go to rehabilitation and job training for drug addicts and convicts. I think that just a tiny chunk of what we spent already in Iraq could have lowered drug use far more than our laws.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think if we ARE to have certain drugs illegal, I definitely think meth should be one of them. Heroin may be another one.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I recently saw a post that equated the death of Heath Ledger as a reason to crack down on drugs more.
I didn't quite understand it, but I didn't want to go on a lot about it because it would derail the thread. It was probably too late though--I probably already derailed it
Anyway--to me, if people want to kill themselves with pills, it's their choice. If someone wants to commit suicide--it's their choice, as long as they don't kill or hurt anyone else in the process, and "the pain of having lost a loved one" doesn't count as "hurting someone".
I don't understand how people can believe in the war on drugs. It hasn't stopped the problem and it costs the kind of money that could be used to fix education and a whole bunch of other things. Too much money is spent on the war on drugs. This is of course, my opinion.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debateman

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 349 Location: New Mexico
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And being the poster that suggested that we needed a drug crack down, I would like to respond.
I respect your desire for freedom. I respect your analysis, but I fear that the analysis is flawed for several reasons.
1) Drugs are objectively bad. They are a threat to society. One person doing them is not the problem, it's that one person sending the message that it's okay to do them. Telling people that it's okay to do drugs lead to a real harm. The loss of parents, the loss of spouses, both economic and emotional impacts beyond losing a friend.
2) Society pays for the ills of drugs either way you slice it. If we allow drugs we encourage the costs to society to rise.
_________________ www.politicalwrinkles.com
www.kizzumeforum.com
www.politicalfever.org
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well then why don't we make alcohol illegal? It causes a lot more problems than some of the drugs that are illegal. How about cigarettes? If we're to have a war on drugs, we need to make cigarettes illegal too. Why shouldn't alcohol and cigarettes be part of the same crackdown?
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debateman

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 349 Location: New Mexico
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm just saying -- if we have alcohol and cigarettes LEGAL, we need to do the same to the others.
If we're going to have the other drugs ILLEGAL, we need to do the same to alcohol and cigarettes.
It needs to be one way or the other, in my opinion.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debateman

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 349 Location: New Mexico
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|  |
|