 |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:09 pm Post subject: Economic stimulus package coming? |
|
|
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120051473033395285.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
| Quote: | WASHINGTON -- Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is expected to offer his support for an economic-stimulus package in his testimony today before Congress.
In discussions with lawmakers in recent days, Mr. Bernanke has outlined his position that a stimulus plan could be useful if properly structured, according to people he has briefed. His key message to policy makers: A stimulus package would need to help the economy this year; avoid boosting the federal deficit in the long term; and support economic growth through increased consumer and business spending.
Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) said Mr. Bernanke in a Monday phone call was "generally supportive" of Congress and President Bush enacting stimulus legislation. "He said that while he wasn't going to endorse a specific plan, if an economic-stimulus package was properly designed and enacted so that it enters the economy quickly, it could have a very positive effect on the economy," Mr. Schumer said. He described the conversation yesterday during a hearing on stimulus plans by the Joint Economic Committee, which he chairs. |
It looks like Friday will be an important day for the future of our economy. We really are in need of some sort of economic stimulus package--it is needed desperately!
All the signs seem to point towards a depression, not just a recession that we seem to currently be in already, according to many financial experts.
Let us hope that Bernanke actually does something about this.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
technocrat

Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Long ago on OLT, when I mentioned a recession leading to a depression, I was laughed off as just exaggerating and crazy. Now they are all agreeing. Amazing prediction skillz I got, yo. I ain't even an economist.
Bad moojo is going down man. I warned'yall.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been seeing this coming for a while--I just was hoping it would be a year or two longer before it actually started to happen.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redstaterebel

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 128
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
We need a package - tax cuts.
This is a chance for the democrats in congress to finally do something with their majority.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tax cuts? That does not sound like the right answer--we could ONLY do that if we completely cut all funding for the war. The economy isn't going to get better by spending more and taxing less.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/01/17/ap4544823.html
| Quote: | WASHINGTON -
President Bush and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Thursday embraced calls for an economic stimulus package to avert a recession, and the president scheduled a speech for Friday to lay out his criteria for the program.
Bernanke, testifying before the House Budget Committee, said such a plan should be aimed at quickly getting cash into the hands of people, especially those with low and moderate incomes. Bush wasn't going to spell out any specifics in his remarks, but instead demand that any package be effective and temporary, said White House press secretary Dana Perino.
Perino said that Bush and congressional leaders from both parties consulted via conference call Thursday for about 30 minutes about their plans to work together on growth measures. |
Well, RSR, it looks like you might be right. The plan you said would do it looks like the plan that is going to be in place.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redstaterebel

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 128
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kizz -
I know that it sounds bad - with already a 300billion per year shortfall - and several trillions in national debt - but its the only thing the government can do.
This is the Reagan model -
Reduce taxes for everyone:
Low/Middle Income: more money in their pockets to pay their bills and buy goods and services.
Upper Income: more money in their pockets to hire people, build factories, start a business, build a house, buy a car ect. Gets the economy moving.
Ideally we should cut gov't spending at the same time - on the wasteful shit that we don't need. However, spending on infrastructure for example also creates jobs and is a stimulus.
Both democrats and republicans agree that tax cuts during hard times are good - the differences are on who gets the lion's share. Reagan proved that we can cut taxes by a TON and the government will eventually take in MORE money than they did at the higher rate. Same with the Bush tax cuts of 01 - the treasury takes in more money now they did in 01.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hope you're right. I hope this will help things.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, here is a clip from a recent story:
http://voanews.com/english/2008-01-19-voa21.cfm
| Quote: | | President Bush says it is a challenging time for the U.S. economy, so he wants as much as $150 billion in tax relief to help. VOA White House Correspondent Scott Stearns reports, opposition Democrats say an economic stimulus package should include greater spending on social programs. |
| Quote: | "In terms of immediate stimulus, Democrats stand ready to work with the president and congressional Republicans to put together a bipartisan package including tax rebates for most Americans and one-time increases in programs directed at those who are bearing the heaviest burdens in this economy," he said.
Frank is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. He says economists agree that middle and working class people are most likely to spend additional money in ways that stimulate the economy and create jobs.
Democrats want to extend unemployment benefits and boost food aid for the poor as part of the stimulus package. That social spending may face opposition from the president who says the deal should not include spending projects with little immediate impact on the economy. |
I agree with the idea of extending unemployment benefits and food aid for the poor. That is a necessity if we're going to call it a "stimulus package". Just cutting taxes and doing nothing else would primarily help the rich. Those that are having problems bringing food on the table and those who have lost their jobs are the REAL people that need to get help in this situation, because if we don't help them, well, let's just say that this whole economic problem could increase by a tenfold.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redstaterebel

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 128
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm ok with extending benefits - with a tax cut for all tax payers (including corporate taxes) - once enacted, it takes awhile for this money
to trickle into the economy - this needs to happen now. I'm not hearing the congressional leadership talking about it much though - which troubles me.
I fear that this is like Iraq - the democrats would rather have the issue for the Nov election than try to fix it now. If the economy is worse in November, they can try to use it to their advantage. The democrats do this regularly and it pisses me off.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh man, I hope you're wrong about the democrats. I sincerely hope you're wrong.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jq

Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 1124
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I disagree with the tax cuts theory, but-- if thatts really what they want to do is cut my taxes-- I won't complain.
As for the dems using this as a political opportunity, let's be honest-- both sides do this. But for the sake of myself and my neighbors I hope the economy gets better soon!
For the record I think the best way to fix our economy is to fight inflation. Inflation is what's hurting my pocketbook the most and a tax cut won't be enough to fix it.
Let me give you an example of recent inflation eating my cash: I shop at costco. I try to stock up for as long as possible so I don't waste time grocery shopping. Last time I went there it was $9.98 for a 60 pack of cheese sticks. Now they are $11. My cold cofee (which helps my health condition more than anything else) used to be $12.26 per dozen. Now it is $13.99. My kirkland brand soda that used to be $4.39 per 24 pack, now $4.85. Everything-- my pizza, canned food, milk, etc, has gone up. Though I typically buy the same exact list of stuff each time, it now cost $20 more every time I shop at costco (Twice a month.) That is now $40 more per month I pay for the same exact food I've always been getting. $480 more per year I pay at costco alone, yet alone everything else I buy including gas, heat, and when I eat out.
I won't be getting a big enough tax cut to adjust my losses from inflation.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, when it comes to businesses, these kinds of tax cuts would be a big thing.
What I'm worried about as far as the democrats, is that they may decide to not actually push forth an answer until near the end of the year or something--that they'll wait to do something about this serious problem.
_________________ Meow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jq

Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 1124
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh believe me, inflation effects businesses. In fact, it effects them the most!
Every time food prices go up, a retailer has two choices. THey can eitehr take a reduced profit margin-- which isn't good for business-- or the can raise the prices of their food-- which isn't good for business.
Why do you think McDonalds started pushing the 4 piece chicken nuggets for $1 so vigilantely? Maybe because beef prices keep rising, and while htey don't want to take the double cheeseburger off the dollar menu and get bad press, they are also aware that it is losing them money.
Trucking businesses are going OUT of business because of inflation. It is too costly to fuel the trucks!
Believe me, inflation is very damaging to businesses, too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chuq

Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 135 Location: Gulf South
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| redstaterebel wrote: | We need a package - tax cuts.
This is a chance for the democrats in congress to finally do something with their majority. |
What part of tax cuts is good for the working majority?
_________________ 'Politics' is made up of two words, 'poli,' which is Greek for 'many,' and 'tics,' which are blood-sucking insects.
- Gore Vidal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|  |
|