 |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| People should be able to get: |
| any type of firearm without hassle |
|
100% |
[ 2 ] |
| any type of firearm with a background check |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| any type of firearm except assault rifles, SAW's and machine guns without hassle |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| any type of firearm except assault rifles, SAW's and machine guns with a background check |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| hunting rifles only without hassle |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| hunting rifles only with a background check |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| I think guns should be illegal except for police |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| I think guns should be illegal for everyone |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 2 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:13 pm Post subject: Gun Control |
|
|
How do you feel about gun control?
I think people should be able to get any type of firearm, since they're going to anyway. It's how things are used that it becomes a problem, to me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chuq

Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 135 Location: Gulf South
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The old , guns do not kill people, people do. This is an emotional issue that usually digresses into name calling.
_________________ 'Politics' is made up of two words, 'poli,' which is Greek for 'many,' and 'tics,' which are blood-sucking insects.
- Gore Vidal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The thing about this subject, for me, is that there is no way we can get guns out of the hands of criminals without declaring the type of martial law that would utterly destroy this country. If there was some magical way, I'd be for getting rid of guns, but since there isn't, I am against the idea of gun control.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chuq

Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 135 Location: Gulf South
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will have to agree with you. But imo they need to be totally banned. I realize that is just an opinion and I will let it go at that. However, I find it interesting that with the wealth of opinions here, that you and I are the only ones willing to discuss it.
_________________ 'Politics' is made up of two words, 'poli,' which is Greek for 'many,' and 'tics,' which are blood-sucking insects.
- Gore Vidal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jen

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I might have a little bit of a different opinion on this one. I believe that guns should not be outlawed. But, I think that every single person that gets one, should have to go through an extensive background check. We have a few guns of our own. My husband is a competition shooter. He also uses guns on a daily basis in his job as a gunner for a .50 cal sniper rifle in the military. I have one here in the house for protection purposes only. I have had a break in before, and hid in a closet, it is not something I ever intend on doing again. With that said, I think that even with hunting rifles, you should have to have an extensive background check. In NC you must have a permit to purchase a pistol, but not a rifle, or shotgun. To me, that is absolutely crazy. A gun, is a gun, is a gun if you ask me. Background checks should be done on every person trying to purchase any kind of firearm. I think that gun control is a must, but I do not think that they should not be owned by anyone at all. I would not feel as safe in my home, with my husband deployed for 15 months, if I did not have my pistol, just in case something happened. To me, it would be unfair to take away my right to own this pistol, because people in general are uncomfortable with guns. If you know how to use one, and respect the weapon, the chances of anything dangerous happens are actually very slim. I know my opinion is different, but that's what it is, my opinion. Just my 2 cents.
_________________ " The feeble tremble before opinion, the foolish defy it, the wise judge it, the skillful direct it." Jeanne-Marie Roland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Having to get a background check is acceptable. Not my favorite, but it is certainly acceptable.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debateman

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 349 Location: New Mexico
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You know, I don't think that any of the options were great. I'm opposed to anyone owning machine guns/ sub-machine guns. I'm all for rifles and revolvers as they make sense for hunting/personal protection.
I'm generally opposed to the federal government becoming involved with the states rights to define the limitations of the law.
_________________ www.politicalwrinkles.com
www.kizzumeforum.com
www.politicalfever.org
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For the sake of argument--what about the people who just want to collect things that are like history/museum pieces?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debateman

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 349 Location: New Mexico
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | For the sake of argument--what about the people who just want to collect things that are like history/museum pieces? |
Perhaps those things belong in a history museum instead of in the hands of private collectors. That is of course if they are to be like a history museum piece. Otherwise they are illegal and should be dismantled.
_________________ www.politicalwrinkles.com
www.kizzumeforum.com
www.politicalfever.org
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kizzume Site Admin

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 2832 Location: Tacoma, WA USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to agree with you, but I can't.
To me, if we start banning some types of firearms, it's too easy to keep pushing onto more and more types. Maybe not--maybe there's a way to keep it at only a certain level. I don't know. ???
Emotionally I agree with you, logically I don't.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redstaterebel

Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 128
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kizz may know this about me - from the other forum (not to be mentioned or slammed here, out of respect for Kizz)
I am a Republican - but the gun thing drives me nuts.
I'm for background checks, waiting periods, and anything else that limits guns - I'm even up for a revision of the 2nd ammendment. Times have changed.
A "well regulated militia" ???? Please.
Assault rifles and handguns have been out of control for 30 years.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|  |
|