Kizzume Forum Index
 HOME   album   FAQ   Search   Memberlist     Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 


This could be considered racist, but it's not how I mean it.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Kizzume Forum Index -> Deep Cleansing
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kizzume
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 2832
Location: Tacoma, WA USA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:32 pm    Post subject: This could be considered racist, but it's not how I mean it. Reply with quote

The things that are considered ?evil? or ?bad? in music has changed a great deal over the years.

Rock ?n Roll was ?music of the Devil? back when it was first starting to be heard.

Elvis? dancing was considered totally unacceptable because it somehow encouraged sex.

Then there was evil hippie music that might get everyone addicted to drugs.

Then you had artists who bit the heads of bats.


NONE of those things mean jack sh** now. None of those things encouraged people to be violent. None of those things glorified gangster life.

Imagine in the 40?s, if music was pushed out on the radio (and other places) that was glorifying the gangster life of that period? There would have been an uproar so big!

Because we allowed those other things after a while without thinking about it, we allowed gangster rap to get as big as it has out of the same apathy. The apathy wasn?t bad in the past, but when it allowed gangster rap to get so big, it is VERY bad.

I am starting to go right back to what I thought before. People flipped me around the other way for a while with some lovely guilt trips, but here I am, right back to where I was:

I think gangster rap should be illegal to play over the airwaves, and I think stores should have to carry special licenses that are really really expensive to obtain in order to legally be able to sell it.

Change or leave. I think police should start cracking down on gangs, giving them the opportunity to change their ways?offer protection from those who want to get out of gangster life, even a relocation program?and if they refuse, they should be given two choices?an extended prison sentence for gang activity, or a free one-way ticket to a country where they can glamorize being a savage as freely as they choose--a country where being a savage is the only way to survive.

We need to stop gang life, it?s essential for us to do, flat out, and I think the first step in doing that is--get that crap off the air. A song about your homie?s new hydraulics that he got from illegal money after f**king b**ches shouldn?t be eligible for the billboard charts, no matter whether the bad words are bleeped or not.

For me, it?s not a race issue?it?s an issue of a culture that acts like a cancer to society. It's a culture that may primarily be associated with one race, but it actually extends across all races. It?s a culture that seems hellbent on making this country as uncivilized as possible, with artificial friendships dangling at the ends of gun barrels. If they want to glamorize living like savages (with expensive stupid-looking clothing and bling), they should do great in countries where they only have the opportunity to live like savages.

_________________
Meow.
Back to top
jq



Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 1124

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

While I agree that gangstar rap has had a very negative impact on society, I think it would be very hard to determine what is considered 'gangstar rap' and not just 'rap.' I mean, is M.I.A. gangster rap? What about saul williams? Pretty soon everything would be getting censored and it wouldn't be long before only Jesus music would be allowed.

I agree with your sentiments, I just don't think it is realistic. I think the backlash would be unreal. And I think the right wing would take this opportunity to promote their religious doctrine on people and turn what we have into even more of a big brother society.

Unfortunately rap sells, so it is going to keep being made. Good luck even trying to make it illegal-- you would have the record industry lobbying so heavily on congress!


As far as racism goes, what you are talking about is in no way racist. The biggest buyer of music is still white kids, and most the people at Interscope who are hiring the gangsters to make music are white guys in suits. It is really just about bottom line.

The only way this can be corrected is, it has to be corrected on its own. What I mean is, when people decide they have had enough, and they want something different, they will start buying something different, and at that point, the record industry will push something different.
Back to top
Kizzume
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 2832
Location: Tacoma, WA USA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jq wrote:
While I agree that gangstar rap has had a very negative impact on society, I think it would be very hard to determine what is considered 'gangstar rap' and not just 'rap.' I mean, is M.I.A. gangster rap? What about saul williams? Pretty soon everything would be getting censored and it wouldn't be long before only Jesus music would be allowed.


It's usually pretty easy to tell. Bitches and hoes, bling, get your roll on, ak47, the N word a million times, back in the hood---the phrases are pretty silly and stereotypical. I don't think there would be a problem being able to pick them apart from other music--besides, the only music that pushes that message is rap, so if it's rap that has those phrases--it's done.
Quote:

I agree with your sentiments, I just don't think it is realistic. I think the backlash would be unreal. And I think the right wing would take this opportunity to promote their religious doctrine on people and turn what we have into even more of a big brother society.
I'm sure the backlash would be unreal. That backlash NEEDS to happen so we can see just how widespread this problem really is.

I don't think this would be an opportunity for the right wing to do that. They might try, but I don't think they'd get anywhere.
Quote:

Unfortunately rap sells, so it is going to keep being made. Good luck even trying to make it illegal-- you would have the record industry lobbying so heavily on congress!
I'm not saying make it illegal in general, it would just be illegal for stores without a special license to sell it, and it couldn't be on the billboard charts. I'm sure you're right about the record industry lobbying it.
Quote:

As far as racism goes, what you are talking about is in no way racist. The biggest buyer of music is still white kids, and most the people at Interscope who are hiring the gangsters to make music are white guys in suits. It is really just about bottom line.

The only way this can be corrected is, it has to be corrected on its own. What I mean is, when people decide they have had enough, and they want something different, they will start buying something different, and at that point, the record industry will push something different.


The thing is, this is not just a gangster rap problem--the gang problem is widespread, and the music is only the first step in taking care of the problem. We really need to allow an easy way for people to get out of gangs without them worrying for their very lives that some of their homies are going to mess them up bad.

_________________
Meow.
Back to top
Segep



Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 222

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, I can see how you can post that without being racist.


But who is it that really supports the gansta rap genre? Gangsters?

And there were definitely violent ganster movies starting in the 30's and continuing to the present.

I say this as one of those annoying white guys who likes gansta rap. occasionally. Hell, I love Eminem, one of the most homophobic (for OBVIOUS reasons) 'gansta' rappers ever. And Beenie Man. I'm supposed to be boycotting him, but I don't.

_________________
Back to top
Segep



Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 222

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why, did you get called racist for that?

_________________
Back to top
Kizzume
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 2832
Location: Tacoma, WA USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coyote wrote:
OK, I can see how you can post that without being racist.


But who is it that really supports the gansta rap genre? Gangsters?

And there were definitely violent ganster movies starting in the 30's and continuing to the present.
Yeah, but those were movies. They weren't the music that a whole industry crams down the throats of the youth. There wasn't TV back then to influence people to quite the degree it does now. There wasn't the genre of rap. There wasn't as much corruption in the music industry.
Quote:

I say this as one of those annoying white guys who likes gansta rap. occasionally. Hell, I love Eminem, one of the most homophobic (for OBVIOUS reasons) 'gansta' rappers ever. And Beenie Man. I'm supposed to be boycotting him, but I don't.


Like I said, I don't think it should be illegal, it just shouldn't be sold at normal stores and it shouldn't be on the billboard charts. I'm sure online sales would skyrocket, as it would be virtually impossible to require a license to sell it online. I think it should be something that is underground, not mainstream.

Eminem wouldn't be gangster rap. He's harsh, he talks about a lot of things, but gangster rap? I've never seen him try to glorify that lifestyle, EVER. I've never heard him do stereotypical rap, EVER. When he says violent things, it hasn't had anything to do with gangs. It doesn't even have much to do with being badass, as he ranks on himself on a normal basis--he brags about himself, but that's not the same thing.

_________________
Meow.
Back to top
Kizzume
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 2832
Location: Tacoma, WA USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coyote wrote:
Why, did you get called racist for that?


I was worried I might. There are a couple places that I don't IMAGINE I could have posted this at without being called a lot of derogatory names.

There have been some people that have very much disliked my more recent changes on the subject of discrimination.

_________________
Meow.


Last edited by Kizzume on Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:25 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
jq



Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 1124

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kizzume wrote:

Eminem wouldn't be gangster rap. He's harsh, he talks about a lot of things, but gangster rap? I've never seen him try to glorify that lifestyle, EVER. I've never heard him do stereotypical rap, EVER. When he says violent things, it hasn't had anything to do with gangs. It doesn't even have much to do with being badass, as he ranks on himself on a normal basis--he brags about himself, but that's not the same thing.


Still, you can see the point I was trying to make-- who is it that determines what is 'gangsta rap' and what isn't?
Back to top
Kizzume
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 2832
Location: Tacoma, WA USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jq wrote:
Kizzume wrote:

Eminem wouldn't be gangster rap. He's harsh, he talks about a lot of things, but gangster rap? I've never seen him try to glorify that lifestyle, EVER. I've never heard him do stereotypical rap, EVER. When he says violent things, it hasn't had anything to do with gangs. It doesn't even have much to do with being badass, as he ranks on himself on a normal basis--he brags about himself, but that's not the same thing.


Still, you can see the point I was trying to make-- who is it that determines what is 'gangsta rap' and what isn't?


That's a good point. It is hard to define.

Maybe we could just try to allow for more ways that people can get out of gangs without fear. I think it's a very sad life that people feel they get stuck in. If we had some sort of relocation thing we could do, maybe we could reduce it. I don't know.

Maybe I'm just grasping at straws.

There HAS to be an answer to this problem. I just wish it got talked about more. People RARELY talk about gang problems. To me, if news really was focusing on important things, 1 out of every 20 stories on the news would be about gangs, but as it stands, it gets mentioned maybe once every 200 stories.

_________________
Meow.
Back to top
jq



Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 1124

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will definitely agree with that. It is a shame that presidential candidates want to talk about terrorism, when terrorism happens every day in LA under a different guise. You know that hundreds of people die in LA every year due to gang violence? Why is nobody talking about this?


I agree. Gangs and gang violence sucks. Of course, I thinkt he best way to treat it is to enrich people's lives and increase prosperity and educational opportunities. I think the reason why people join gangs probably has a lot to do with feeling like they don't have anything else to turn to.
Back to top
Segep



Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 222

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kizzume wrote:

Yeah, but those were movies. They weren't the music that a whole industry crams down the throats of the youth. There wasn't TV back then to influence people to quite the degree it does now. There wasn't the genre of rap. There wasn't as much corruption in the music industry.
Those are all excellent points and true. The only thing I would add is that I bet the music industry WAS that corrupt, but they just didn't have the experience to practice it on such a wide and efficient scale.

Kizzume wrote:
Like I said, I don't think it should be illegal, it just shouldn't be sold at normal stores and it shouldn't be on the billboard charts. I'm sure online sales would skyrocket, as it would be virtually impossible to require a license to sell it online. I think it should be something that is underground, not mainstream.


Yeah, but how are you going to accomplish that? In a free market you have to provide something more desirable if you want to change consumer habits. The problem is the market isn't really free. Breaking up ClearChannel and the other big radio conglomerates might make it easier for alternatives to flourish and widen the selection of music available. That might help to accomplish the same thing without appearing to legislate morality or discriminate against a perceived minority group genre.

_________________
Back to top
Kizzume
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 2832
Location: Tacoma, WA USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, you're probably right.

The record and broadcast industry have made quite a problem, haven't they?

_________________
Meow.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Kizzume Forum Index -> Deep Cleansing All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group, premodded by FoxyMods,and optimized by phpBB SEO.Skin by: K I Z Z U M E